|
![]() |
![]()
Treo 600 |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
Palm Treo 600
Friday 16 September 2005
Wow, what a good question.
Reading the Treo forums all over the 'net I see that Palm hasn't improved its customer support or customer retention policies any, and there seem to be some hardware problems (at least for some users), so owning a Treo 600 won't be trouble-free. In addition, Palm wasn't able to get Bluetooth into the Treo 600, which is something I want in a new phone. Batteries are still not a user-serviceable part (theoretically), and Palm is charging an exorbitant amount for the replacement. All good reasons not to buy a Treo 600.
On the other hand, I've been without a PDA in my pocket for almost a year, and that's really annoying. There are costs involved with not buying too; it's a bit more subtle than the cost of buying, but it's real.
Perhaps even more of an impact is being without 'net access when I happen to need it: when there's something to communicate, something to research, or just something that needs to be done in a networked way. A long time ago Sun Microsystems coined the phrase "the network is the computer" and it's so true; there are so many times that I want something that's just around the corner, digitally speaking.
Luckily there are companies who are looking to liquidate their existing stock in favor of the later models, the Treo 650 and the rumored soon-to-be-out Treo 700. For about one-third of the price recently a brand-new Orange-branded (hence the pictures on this page) Treo 600 is sitting in my pocket.
Some early points of interest are a USB cable for both synchronizing and charging of the phone; no clumsy cradles or AC wall sockets used. That's sweet. The size of the phone is surprizingly small, especially when I compare it with my Nokia super-basic phone.
The sound quality is excellent, having polyphonic MIDI and MP3 ringtones is nice, and photo Caller ID is very pleasant.
There's still a lot to play around with here, including always-on instant messenging, so it'll be a while before I decide whether this was a good choice (versus, let's say, a more rugged non-PDA phone like the Motorola RAZR).
The built-in camera is horrid, but still better than nothing. Here's some photos I've taken over the last two days, with commentary. The photos are presented in all their 0.3 megapixel glory, 640x480 pixels and scaled to 320x240; some folks swear by this.
|
Have you found errors nontrivial or marginal, factual, analytical and illogical, arithmetical, temporal, or even typographical? Please let me know; drop me email. Thanks! |