|
![]() |
![]()
Gramicci |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
Gramicci
The pants are very, very comfortable. This style couldn't be used in any mildly dressy situation, but that works fine for my lifestyle.
So why did I stop buying them? Well, that seamless crotch gusset panel wears out much more quickly for me. I'd have a good-looking pair of pants, but without a crotch. Yes, I could have had a tailor repair them (at a cost similar to buying a new one), or perhaps experimented with my vintage Singer sewing machine, but I have a life (and offspring). Time is too precious, and I got too unhappy with the piles of almost-good pants in my closet. (I burned a few of them each year at Burning Man, giving them a busy course of Ranger duty before the big burn, but I'd have prefered pants without this design flaw.)
My replacement? When bifurcated pants are necessary I use Popper's khaki battle-dress uniform (BDU) pants. They made them for me when I was in the service, and again when I'm a civilian (and might not want that natty camoulflage pattern all the time :-). Ripstop cotton blend, comfy, inexpensive.
When bifurcated pants are unnecessary, Utilikilt.
|
Have you found errors nontrivial or marginal, factual, analytical and illogical, arithmetical, temporal, or even typographical? Please let me know; drop me email. Thanks! |